In the early days of eLearning, your online training ecosystem may have revolved around your LMS — learning management system — or consisted entirely of an LMS. But the online training landscape is changing to accommodate a broad variety of learning platforms and strategies. Your online training ecosystem may well include a learning experience platform (LXP); a microlearning platform; various social and collaborative learning tools — and a place to gather and store learning data collected from all of these as well as other online and in-person learning activities. That place is likely to be an LRS — a learning record store.

The LRS is part of an xAPI ecosystem, which enables you to collect learning data from an enormous variety of places where learning occurs. The xAPI standard makes it possible to create statements about learning activities, such as viewing a video, reading an article, completing an activity, or participating in a simulation, far beyond the course completions, engagement time, and test scores that your SCORM-based LMS gathers. You can also collect data on activities that occur in a much larger number of platforms and learning spaces — anything from a mobile app to a CPR dummy to a kiosk on your warehouse floor.

The LRS collects all learning activity data

Two folders with files flying between them in an arc.

Any tool or platform in your ecosystem that collects data on learning activities, including your LMS, will send that data to the LRS.

Using an LRS in an xAPI-compliant online training ecosystem empowers your L&D strategy: Most LRS platforms include sophisticated reporting and analytics features as well, making the LRS an essential component in a data-driven training strategy.

Once your various online and in-person training activities are recorded in the LRS, the LRS might:

  • Share the data with other systems, facilitating adaptive and personalized training
  • Enable powerful analytics using data from across the organization
  • Provide data sets useful for correlating training with performance and business data

… and much more.

The LRS works with the LMS

Your LRS can be integrated with your LMS. It can also be configured to control access to records and to determine which tools and platforms can create or access records.

While both the LRS and the LMS might include analytics and reporting abilities, the LRS does not replace the LMS. Most LRSs do not offer the user and course content management functions of an LMS, or the advanced certification, scheduling, reminders, discussion forums, and quizzing abilities a full-featured LMS will offer.

Do you need an LRS?

Whether you need to add an LRS to your online training ecosystem depends on your training strategy and goals. If you have tools in your ecosystem that generate xAPI statements, you probably need an LRS. If you plan to expand your training strategy beyond SCORM-compliant tools and platforms — and you want to be able to capture and use data on those learning activities, you probably need an LRS. If your training occurs in a small number of places or you have only a small number of learners to track, you probably do not need an LRS.

If you have questions about whether you need an LRS — or any other questions about developing your training strategy and ecosystem — connect with a learning consultant at Neovation Learning Solutions today.

Poor Use with
Adult Learners
Effective with
Adult Learners

Games

Simple games layered on top of content

Scenario-based games that use the content

Leaderboards, competition

Fan excessive competition among employees or teams by offering large prizes for top performers and/or shaming those with lower scores

Challenge employees to beat their own past performance, or design a leaderboard that shows each employee only the four scorers above and below them

Points, rewards, badges

Award points or levels for completing sections of training or playing for a set number of minutes

Award levels, badges or points for recalling or applying content correctly, demonstrating mastery

  • Remember — bookmark, google, link, search
  • Understand — annotate, Boolean search, journal, tweet
  • Apply — chart, display, execute, present, upload
  • Analyze — attribute, deconstruct, illustrate, mash, mind map
  • Evaluate — comment, editorialize, moderate, network, post
  • Create — blog, film, integrate, podcast, program, publish
A smiling, mature man with short brown hair and a mustache. He sports a black suit jacket and a gray button up shirt with no tie.

As Neovation's Manitoba Territory Manager, I'm continually reminded of the resiliency, innovation, and initiative of Manitoba’s business community. Seeing these budding entrepreneurs develop and present their business plans reinforces that Manitoba is a great place to do business.

– Gord Holmes

Comparison of the Three Levels of eLearning Content
Type
Off-the-shelf subscription libraries
Pros
  • Saves development time - you don’t have to create any courses yourself.
  • Good fit for a limited budget.
  • Quick to set up and launch.
  • Access to hundreds of courses on a wide variety of topics.
Cons
  • Users cannot make any changes to the pre-existing content.
  • Users do not own any of the content.
  • An overwhelming amount of courses and a short time in which to complete the training can create a higher likelihood of users experiencing learner fatigue.
  • Learners may view content that isn’t relevant to their learning objectives.
  • Time and resources can be spent curating your content library to suit your learners.
Type
Course customization
Pros
  • A premade course that is quick to set up and launch.
  • Customization options such as adding your logo, branding, choice of colors, or some fonts.
Cons
  • You do not own the content of the course.
  • You cannot make significant changes to the content of the course (e.g. adding your own images, data, or organization’s terminology).
  • You cannot make significant changes to the content of the course (e.g. adding your own images, data, or organization’s terminology).
Type
Fully custom courses
Pros
  • Completely tailored to meet your organization's audience, needs, and strategies.
  • You have limitless creative potential.
  • You own the original content/IP.
  • Prevent learner fatigue through personalization.
  • You can change, personalize, and maintain the courses however you want and at your discretion.
Cons
  • More expensive - custom courses are a bigger investment for both time and resources.
  • Learners will not have access to as many course options as quickly as they would through a library subscription.
  • A professional eLearning development team should be assigned to this project - either hired in-house or contracted.
Pamela S. Hogle

An experienced writer, editor, tech writer, and blogger, Pam helps you make sense of learning science and eLearning technology. She provides information you can use to drive improvements in your training effectiveness and ROI.

Read more articles by Pamela S. Hogle